When developing analytical methods for pharmaceuticals, two critical aspects must be considered—validation and verification. While both ensure the accuracy and reliability of analytical techniques, they serve distinct purposes. Understanding their differences is essential for maintaining regulatory compliance and product quality.
Analytical validation is the process of proving that a method is suitable for its intended purpose. It ensures that the method provides accurate, precise, and reproducible results under specified conditions.
Validation is required for newly developed methods before they are implemented in routine analysis.
Verification, on the other hand, is the process of confirming that an established analytical method performs as expected when used under specific conditions in a particular laboratory.
| Feature | Validation | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | To establish method suitability | To confirm method performance in a new setting |
| When Required | For new methods | When transferring or adopting an existing method |
| Regulatory Need | Required for new submissions | Required for site-specific implementation |
Both processes are essential to maintain pharmaceutical quality control, ensuring that drugs meet regulatory standards and remain safe for consumption.
IntroductionAn FDA Inspection Readiness Audit is a proactive evaluation of your facility, documentation, and quality systems—designed to uncover potential issues before regulators do. It simulates a real FDA inspection and... Read more
Pharmaceutical products must meet strict regulatory requirements to ensure their safety, efficacy, and quality. Analytical testing plays a crucial role in maintaining compliance with these regulations by verifying the chemical... Read more
IntroductionAn Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is the regulatory pathway for getting generic drugs approved by the U.S. FDA. Filing an ANDA is a strategic move that allows pharmaceutical companies... Read more